The applicant requested a reconsideration of a Tribunal decision that dismissed her claim for an in-home/attendant care assessment and a chiropractic treatment plan.
The applicant argued the Tribunal made significant errors of law by ignoring a prior FSCO decision and errors of fact by ignoring evidence regarding her pain reduction, geographic location, and medical practitioners.
The Vice-Chair dismissed the request, finding that the FSCO decision was not binding and that the Tribunal had properly considered and weighed the evidence in determining the treatment was not reasonable and necessary.
