The Crown brought an application to appoint amicus curiae for the self-represented accused in a complex dangerous offender proceeding.
The accused opposed the appointment, asserting his right to represent himself.
The court granted the application, finding that the complexity of the dangerous offender hearing, the potential for an indeterminate sentence, and the need to ensure a fair trial necessitated the appointment of amicus to assist the court with legal issues and cross-examination of the complainant.