The appellant, under the supervision of the Ontario Review Board since 2009 for serious offences, appealed the Board's disposition maintaining his detention at Ontario Shores.
He argued the detention order was not the least onerous or restrictive, seeking a conditional discharge or a rehearing.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the Board's decision reasonable, particularly its rejection of a conditional discharge due to the appellant's continued need for professional supervision and history of relapse.
The court affirmed that the Board is not required to address every piece of evidence in its reasons.
