The applicant, a citizen of Jamaica, sought judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Protection Division dismissing his refugee claim.
The RPD found that the applicant's fears of generalized crime and corruption did not establish a nexus to a Convention ground under section 96, and that he failed to demonstrate a personalized risk under section 97.
The Federal Court found the RPD's decision reasonable, noting the lack of evidence supporting a personalized risk or persecution based on religion.
