The appellant, a contest sponsor, appealed a Small Claims Court decision awarding the respondent $25,000 for an uncollected radio contest prize.
The trial judge found a contract existed between the sponsor and the winner but provided no analysis to support this conclusion.
The Divisional Court held that the trial judge erred in law by failing to articulate a legal basis for finding a contract, which prevented meaningful appellate review.
The appeal was allowed, the trial decision was set aside, and a new trial was ordered.