The appellant appealed a zoning by-law amendment that permitted a 45-unit residential infill development for seniors, arguing it interfered with their adjacent development plans by creating a permanent turning circle.
The parties reached a settlement that revised the site plan to ensure access without interfering with the appellant's lot.
The Tribunal accepted uncontested expert planning evidence that the revised development and draft amended zoning by-law had regard to provincial interests, were consistent with the Provincial Policy Statement, and conformed to the applicable Official Plans.
The appeal was allowed in part to implement the settlement.
