The appellant appealed a Small Claims Court decision dismissing his claim for $30,000 against the respondents.
The appellant sought indemnification for legal costs incurred in defending a separate, unrelated lawsuit, relying on a Memorandum of Settlement and release signed with the respondents.
He also claimed damages for negligence and mental distress.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding the trial judge correctly applied the principles of contract interpretation from Sattva and Corner Brook to conclude the indemnity did not cover unforeseeable future claims.
The court also upheld the trial judge's dismissal of the negligence claim due to a lack of evidence establishing a standard of care, and found no error in the discretionary assessment of costs.
