The appellant tenant appealed a decision of the Landlord and Tenant Board, which found that the landlord's restriction of her access to the building's parking garage did not constitute a substantial interference with her reasonable enjoyment of the rental unit.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, holding that the issue of substantial interference is a question of mixed fact and law, over which the court has no jurisdiction.
The court further noted that even if it were a question of law, the Board's conclusion was correct.
