The appellants, bondholders of BC Tel (predecessor to Telus), appealed a trial decision finding that BC Tel did not breach a 'no financial advantage covenant' when it redeemed bonds using proceeds from a securitization transaction.
The covenant prohibited redemption using funds obtained directly or indirectly through borrowings with an interest cost less than 11.35%.
The Court of Appeal allowed the appeal, holding that while the securitization involved a 'true sale' of accounts receivable, the transaction as a whole functioned to raise capital from the public.
Thus, the proceeds applied to redeem the bonds constituted funds indirectly obtained through borrowings at an interest cost to the company of less than 11.35%, violating the covenant.