The accused was charged with Public Mischief for falsely accusing the complainant of assault following a night of drinking and intimacy.
The Crown presented evidence from the complainant, his mother, and a police officer.
The court found that the accused's allegations were intentionally false based on video surveillance evidence that contradicted her account, the complainant's credible testimony, and the accused's inconsistent statements to police.
The court found the accused guilty of Public Mischief.
