J. Kasozi

The self-represented plaintiff succeeded in a construction lien action, recovering $8,277.97 after claiming over $67,000.

The defendants, who failed on their $112,000 counterclaim, argued the plaintiff should be denied costs because the recovery fell within the Small Claims Court jurisdiction and because of an unaccepted offer to settle.

The court held that the Small Claims Court lacks jurisdiction over lien actions, making Rule 57.05(1) inapplicable.

The court awarded the plaintiff $9,000 in partial indemnity costs, reducing the amount due to his failure to engage in reasonable settlement negotiations.

The plaintiff contractor brought a construction lien action against the defendant homeowners for unpaid amounts and extras on a fixed-price home renovation contract.

The homeowners counterclaimed for construction deficiencies and incomplete work.

The court found that the parties had varied the contract by conduct to allow for extras without written change orders, but the contractor only proved entitlement to a few of the claimed extras.

The court dismissed most of the homeowners' deficiency claims due to unreliable expert evidence, but awarded them several credits for incomplete work and unapproved material substitutions.

Ultimately, the court found the homeowners breached the contract by failing to pay the final installment and granted the contractor judgment and a valid lien for the remaining balance of $8,277.97.

The applicant, a high school student, sought urgent judicial review of decisions by her school board and athletic committee denying her eligibility to play on the school basketball team for one year following a transfer.

The applicant argued she transferred due to bullying and that the decisions were biased and procedurally unfair.

The Divisional Court found it had jurisdiction to hear the urgent application but dismissed it on the merits, concluding there was no reasonable apprehension of bias or breach of procedural fairness in the administrative decision-making process.