The plaintiff brought a motion to certify a proposed class proceeding for settlement purposes and to approve a settlement agreement with certain defendants alleged to have participated in a conspiracy to fix prices in the cathode ray tube (CRT) industry.
The settlement provided for a payment of $4.15 million and additional non‑monetary cooperation.
The court held that the action met the certification requirements under s. 5(1) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 for settlement purposes and that the settlement was fair, reasonable, and in the best interests of the class.
The plaintiff also sought approval of contingency fees, disbursements, and taxes pursuant to the retainer agreement.
The court found the requested fees and disbursements reasonable given the complexity and risks of the litigation.
