3 total
Physician suspended for three months for failing to provide records and cooperate with College investigation.
The registrant, a family physician, failed to respond to a patient's repeated requests to complete insurance forms and another patient's requests to forward medical records to their lawyer.
She also failed to cooperate with the College's investigation into these complaints.
Based on an agreed statement of facts, the Tribunal found the registrant engaged in professional misconduct.
Accepting a joint submission on penalty, the Tribunal ordered a reprimand, a three-month suspension of her certificate of registration, specified educational and practice monitoring requirements, and $6,000 in costs.
Psychological associate reprimanded and ordered to undergo coaching for failing to supervise an unregistered practitioner.
The member faced allegations of professional misconduct for failing to adequately supervise an unregistered psychotherapist and failing to maintain proper clinical and billing records.
The member admitted to the allegations via an Agreed Statement of Facts.
The Discipline Committee found the member guilty of professional misconduct and accepted a joint submission on penalty, ordering a reprimand and a 12-month individualized coaching program at the member's expense.
Tribunal dismisses most human rights allegations for lack of evidence, allowing only disability claims against employer to proceed.
The applicant filed a human rights application alleging discrimination by her employer (CAMH), her union (ONA), and a psychiatrist (Dr. Klassen) on multiple grounds including race, sex, age, disability, and reprisal.
The Tribunal held a summary hearing to determine if the allegations had a reasonable prospect of success.
The Tribunal dismissed all allegations against ONA and Dr. Klassen, and all allegations against CAMH except those relating to disability accommodation and termination, finding the dismissed allegations lacked evidence linking the respondents' conduct to Code grounds or were out of time.
The remaining disability allegations against CAMH were scheduled for a further preliminary hearing to address timeliness and whether they had been dealt with in another proceeding.
