The applicants, claiming to be the rightfully elected directors of a temple, applied for an order appointing a monitor over the temple's affairs and freezing its assets.
They alleged that the respondent former directors misappropriated funds and failed to hold lawful elections.
The court found the applicants' allegations of breach of trust were unsubstantiated and did not raise a serious issue to be tried.
The application was dismissed, as there was no basis to impose a monitor under the court's equitable jurisdiction.
