The Crown appealed a sentence imposed for five offences arising from a single incident involving the respondent's estranged spouse and children.
The court held that a 12-month sentence, in addition to pre-trial custody, was manifestly unfit given the night-time armed break-in, death threats, aggravated assault on the spouse in the children's presence, and assault on a child who intervened.
While noting the respondent was a 53-year-old first offender, the court concluded a substantial penitentiary term was required and substituted a sentence of 3.5 years after applying the same pre-trial custody credit.
The court also held that the sentencing judge erred by failing to impose the mandatory s. 109 prohibition order and added a 10-year prohibition.