Terrence Noftall, convicted of multiple sexual and child pornography offences, challenged the validity of production orders obtained by the Crown for psychiatric, psychological, medical, and employment records.
These records were sought in preparation for a potential dangerous offender application.
The defence argued that the production orders lacked statutory authority under s. 487.014 of the Criminal Code, as a dangerous offender application had not yet commenced, and that the disclosure of MCSCS records via a Memorandum of Understanding violated privacy rights.
The court dismissed the defence's application, ruling that s. 487.014 applies to the sentencing phase, including pre-assessment for dangerous offender applications, and that the MCSCS records were lawfully obtained under the Freedom of Information and Protection of Privacy Act.