The appellant father appealed a motion judge's order varying child support, arguing errors in income calculation, the inclusion of a collapsed pension in income, and the costs award.
The respondent mother cross-appealed the retroactive reduction of child support.
Applying the standard of review from Hickey v. Hickey, the Divisional Court found no error in principle or significant misapprehension of evidence by the motion judge.
Both the appeal and cross-appeal were dismissed, with costs of the appeal awarded to the respondent.
