The applicant sought judicial review of a Service Manager's decision refusing to extend the time to apply for special priority status for rent-geared-to-income housing assistance.
The applicant, a victim of past abuse, missed the deadline due to her immigration status at the time.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding that the Service Manager reasonably exercised his discretion by prioritizing applicants who were at risk of further abuse.
The court noted that deference is owed to polycentric decisions involving the allocation of limited public resources.
