The moving party sought an adjournment of its motion for leave to appeal an Assessment Review Board decision, pending the outcome of its concurrent request for a review of the same decision by the Board.
The respondents opposed the adjournment, arguing it would result in a multiplicity of proceedings and give the moving party 'two kicks at the can'.
The Divisional Court granted the adjournment, holding that parallel proceedings are authorized by statute and that administrative proceedings should be allowed to run their full course before judicial review is pursued.
