The applicant minor hockey association sought an interlocutory injunction to prevent the respondent governing body from re-allocating minor hockey programming contrary to a 2018 agreement.
The court applied the RJR-MacDonald test and found that while there was a serious issue to be tried regarding whether reasonable notice of termination was required, the applicant failed to establish irreparable harm.
The court found that any financial losses were quantifiable and compensable in damages, and the balance of convenience did not favour granting the injunction.
The motion was dismissed.
