2 total
The accused was acquitted after his credible testimony raised a reasonable doubt regarding his knowledge.
The accused was charged with drug and driving-related offences arising from his interaction with a co-accused.
The Crown's case relied on intercepted phone calls, surveillance evidence, and the discovery of a large quantity of drugs in the accused's vehicle following a high-speed chase.
The central issues were knowledge and credibility.
The accused testified that he was unaware of any drugs being brought into the country, that he was merely assisting his friend's brother with accommodation and transportation, and that he believed he was being chased by dangerous individuals rather than police officers.
The court found the accused's testimony compelling and credible, and determined that the Crown had failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the accused had knowledge of the drugs or consent to their transportation.
An acquittal was entered on all counts.
The court granted enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody beyond the statutory maximum due to harsh lockdown conditions and denial of religious accommodation.
The accused pleaded guilty to possessing 7 kilograms of cocaine for the purposes of trafficking contrary to section 5(2) of the Controlled Drugs and Substances Act.
At sentencing, the court considered the harsh conditions of pre-sentence custody endured by the accused, including 115 days of lockdown (approximately one-third of his custody time), double bunking, denial of religious accommodation, and significant mental health impacts.
The Crown sought 7 years and 5.5 months; the defence sought 6 years and 5 months with enhanced credit for pre-sentence custody.
The court imposed a sentence of 6 years and 10 months, applying enhanced credit of 29 months for pre-sentence custody conditions, resulting in a further sentence of 4 years and 7 months to be served in federal penitentiary.
