The applicant sought statutory accident benefits following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied benefits on the basis that the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG).
The applicant argued she should be removed from the MIG due to an accident-related psychological injury.
The Tribunal found the applicant failed to establish a psychological injury warranting removal from the MIG, placing little weight on her psychological reports due to lack of objective testing and inconsistencies.
The application for benefits and interest was dismissed.
