The plaintiff brought a motion for summary judgment to recognize and enforce a default judgment obtained in Maryland against the defendants for $107,797.63 USD.
The defendants opposed the motion, arguing that the Maryland court lacked jurisdiction, the judgment was obtained by fraud, natural justice was denied, and enforcement would be contrary to public policy.
The court found that the Maryland court properly assumed jurisdiction, the defendants failed to prove fraud or denial of natural justice, and there was no genuine issue requiring a trial.
The motion to enforce the foreign judgment was granted.