The appellants appealed a decision refusing to set aside a noting in default and enforcing a U.S. District Court judgment.
They argued there was a failure of natural justice because the self-represented appellant was not permitted to read her prepared submissions.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding the motion judge merely assisted in focusing submissions and committed no error in principle in refusing to set aside the default.
The court ordered a stay of execution pending the final resolution of the appellants' appeals in the United States.
