The defendant employer brought a Rule 21 motion to strike the plaintiff's claim for wrongful dismissal.
The plaintiff argued that the employment contract's termination provisions, which limited entitlements to Employment Standards Act (ESA) minimums, were void for ambiguity and failure to properly reference statutory exemptions.
The court found the contractual terms clear and unambiguous, complying with the ESA, and granted the defendant's motion, striking out the plaintiff's claim.
