The applicant brought an urgent motion seeking a refraining order to prevent the Family Responsibility Office (FRO) from suspending his driver's licence and an order suspending FRO's enforcement proceedings.
The urgent aspect of the motion became moot when FRO cancelled licence suspension proceedings due to the COVID-19 pandemic.
The request for a stay of enforcement was dismissed because it was not served on the support recipient and was typically part of a motion to change, not a freestanding claim.
The motion was dismissed without prejudice to the applicant's right to bring a further motion at a later date.
