The applicant sought an extension of time to file a motion for leave to appeal an interlocutory costs order made by Justice Gilmore.
While the applicant established a bona fide intention to appeal and a reasonable explanation for the delay, the court found no merit in the proposed appeal.
The applicant failed to demonstrate conflicting decisions or good reason to doubt the correctness of the costs order under Rule 62.02(4) of the Rules of Civil Procedure.
The motion for an extension of time was dismissed with costs to the respondent.