The applicant union applied for certification to represent employees of the respondent.
The parties agreed on most matters but disputed whether the applicant held trade union status under the Labour Relations Act.
The respondent argued that the applicant's formation violated democratic principles, its constitution was not strictly followed regarding charter fees, and a constitutional provision barring subversive members violated the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.
The Board rejected these arguments, finding that the applicant was properly chartered, adopted a constitution, had members and officers, and was formed for labour relations purposes.
The Board granted interim certification pending the resolution of a dispute over the managerial status of two employees.