Gerry Boudreau

The applicant filed a case with the Condominium Authority Tribunal regarding a records request for meeting minutes, lease notices, and Periodic Information Certificates.

During mediation, the respondent provided the requested documents and agreed to reimburse the filing fee.

The applicant continued to dispute minor issues regarding redactions, draft minutes, and undated certificates, as well as demanding a personal apology.

The Tribunal found that the core records had been provided, the redactions were justified by litigation privilege, and the remaining issues were either minor or outside its jurisdiction.

The case was dismissed under Rule 19.1(a) of the Tribunal's Rules of Practice.

The applicant, a board member of one condominium corporation, requested records from another condominium corporation with which it shares facilities.

The Condominium Authority Tribunal issued a Notice of Intent to Dismiss the Case due to a lack of jurisdiction.

The Tribunal found that under section 1.36(2) of the Condominium Act, 1998, it only has jurisdiction over disputes between an owner or mortgagee and the corporation, another owner, occupier, or mortgagee.

As this was a dispute between two corporations, the Tribunal dismissed the application.