The plaintiff, a judgment creditor, brought an action to set aside a transfer of real property from the defendants (debtor and spouse) to the spouse for nominal consideration, alleging it was a fraudulent conveyance under the Fraudulent Conveyances Act.
Both parties moved for summary judgment.
The court dismissed the defendants' request to redact the record, found the action was not limitation-barred (applying the 10-year Real Property Limitations Act period or, alternatively, the discoverability principle for the 2-year Limitations Act, 2002), and determined that the transfer was made with intent to defeat creditors, citing multiple "badges of fraud." The court granted judgment to the plaintiff, declaring the transfer void against creditors, and awarded costs.