3 total
Judicial review of CRA requests for information to Swiss authorities dismissed.
The applicants sought judicial review to quash three requests for information sent by the Canada Revenue Agency (CRA) to the Swiss Federal Tax Administration.
The CRA suspected the applicants had unreported foreign assets and issued the requests under the Canada-Switzerland Income Tax Convention.
The applicants argued the CRA acted on illegally obtained confidential information, violated solicitor-client privilege, and failed to exhaust domestic avenues.
The Federal Court applied the reasonableness standard and found the CRA had the authority to issue the requests and complied with statutory requirements.
The Court dismissed the applications with costs.
Interest on loans is not deductible once the source of income ceases to exist.
The taxpayer claimed deductions for interest paid on loans initially contracted to purchase real property and shares in a company.
By the time the deductions were claimed, the property had been sold and the company had gone bankrupt.
The Deputy Minister of Revenue disallowed the deductions.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the Deputy Minister's appeal, holding that the deductibility of interest depends on the current use of the borrowed funds and presupposes the existence of a source of income.
Because the properties were sold and the company was bankrupt with no prospect of resuming activities, the sources of income had ceased to exist, and the interest was no longer deductible.
Interest on borrowed money used to buy shares is deductible if there is a reasonable expectation of income.
The appellants borrowed money to purchase shares in foreign companies structured to avoid FAPI rules and provide tax advantages.
Over eight years, they received $600,000 in dividends and incurred $6 million in interest charges, which they deducted under s. 20(1)(c)(i) of the Income Tax Act.
The Minister disallowed the deductions, arguing the true purpose was to defer taxes and convert income into capital gains.
The Supreme Court of Canada allowed the appeal, holding that the test for interest deductibility is whether the taxpayer had a reasonable expectation of income at the time the investment was made.
The Court found the appellants had such an expectation, and the interest costs were deductible.