Fabiola Ferreyra Coral

The applicant, a citizen of Mexico and former police officer, sought judicial review of a decision by the Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) confirming the rejection of his refugee protection claim.

The applicant argued the RAD breached procedural fairness by considering prospective risk, which he claimed was a new issue not addressed by the Refugee Protection Division (RPD).

The Federal Court dismissed the application, finding the RAD had jurisdiction to consider prospective risk and that the applicant's lack of credibility rendered the finding of no prospective risk reasonable.

The applicant sought judicial review of a Refugee Appeal Division (RAD) decision confirming the rejection of his refugee claim.

The applicant alleged persecution in Colombia due to his work as a volunteer topographer assisting with land restitution.

The Refugee Protection Division found him not credible.

The RAD upheld the decision and refused to admit new evidence submitted by the applicant, finding it irrelevant.

The Federal Court dismissed the application, holding that the RAD reasonably assessed the new evidence and that the applicant failed to establish a reasonable apprehension of bias.