2 total
Expert fee disbursement reduced as unreasonable on costs assessment.
The successful plaintiffs sought recovery of expert witness disbursements following a summary judgment decision in their favour.
The parties agreed on partial indemnity costs of $25,000 plus HST, leaving only the amount recoverable for the plaintiffs’ expert report in dispute.
The court considered the reasonableness of the expert’s hourly rate and time spent, noting that the expert evidence had been largely unnecessary and that costs awards must be fair and reasonable under rule 57.01(1).
Applying principles governing recovery of expert fees similar to those for counsel fees, the court reduced the claimed expert disbursement from $13,000 to $9,000 plus HST.
Lawyer liable for failing to warn client of costly title defect risk.
The defendants moved for summary judgment dismissing a solicitor’s negligence claim arising from a commercial real estate transaction involving a building encroaching on a municipal laneway.
The plaintiffs alleged their lawyers failed to warn that the municipality might require payment to convey the laneway and that the title insurance obtained did not cover such a cost.
The court rejected arguments that the claim was statute‑barred and held that expert evidence was unnecessary because the failure to warn of a significant legal risk was apparent on the record.
Applying the “but for” causation test, the court found that had proper advice been given the plaintiffs likely would have sought protection such as a holdback or price abatement.
The motion for summary judgment was dismissed and partial summary judgment was granted to the plaintiffs, leaving only the assessment of damages and the claim against the title insurer for trial.
