The applicants brought a proceeding under the Substitute Decisions Act to remove the respondent as joint Attorney for Property for their father.
The respondent had impeded the applicant's role as Attorney for Personal Care and refused to share authority over property.
Following the father's death, the court had to determine the costs of the proceeding and address the passing of the respondent's accounts as Estate Trustee.
The court found that the respondent's unreasonable conduct caused the litigation and ordered him to personally pay the applicants' costs on a full recovery basis.
The court also found the respondent's estate accounts were not in the proper form and set a timetable for the delivery of revised accounts.
