The applicant, a child with autism, sought judicial review of a decision to discharge her from a regional Intensive Behaviour Intervention (IBI) program.
The program's clinical director determined after a 12-month assessment that the therapy was not resulting in cognitive and learning improvements.
The applicant argued the decision was unreasonable and the process lacked procedural fairness.
The Divisional Court dismissed the application, finding the clinical decision was reasonable and the applicant was afforded procedural fairness through evaluations, meetings, and an independent review mechanism.
