2 total
The court awarded the successful self-represented defendants significantly reduced costs due to their modest recovery and conduct.
The Master rendered a costs decision following a trial in which the plaintiff, Almos Dezsi, had his claim dismissed, and the defendants, Angela Walker, Peter Walker, and Bank of Montreal, succeeded on their counterclaim for a significantly reduced amount.
The court considered factors such as self-representation, proportionality of success, offers to settle, complexity, reasonable expectations, and the conduct of both parties.
Despite being the successful party, the defendants were awarded $7,500 in partial indemnity costs, reflecting their modest recovery on the counterclaim (8.7% of the amount claimed) and their failure to make reasonable settlement offers.
The court dismissed the defendants' motion for summary judgment, finding genuine issues for trial regarding damages and the inappropriateness of partial summary judgment.
The defendants brought a motion for summary judgment to dismiss the plaintiffs' claims for damages arising from construction on an adjacent property and a failed retaining wall, or alternatively, to transfer the action to Small Claims Court.
The plaintiffs claimed damages for interference with their home's use and enjoyment, including punitive and aggravated damages.
The court dismissed the defendants' motion, finding that genuine issues requiring a trial existed, particularly concerning punitive damages and the complex nature of the crossclaims.
The court emphasized that partial summary judgment is a "rare procedure" and that the motion did not meet the objectives of proportionality, timeliness, and affordability as outlined in *Hryniak* and *Butera*.
