The appellant appealed a decision of the Health Professions Appeal and Review Board confirming the refusal of his application for registration as a Traditional Chinese Medicine Practitioner and Acupuncturist.
The appellant had failed the required prior learning assessment process (PLAR) case study assessment twice.
On appeal, he argued the Board erred in denying his request for an adjournment and in finding he did not meet the registration requirements.
The Divisional Court dismissed the appeal, finding no error in the Board's discretionary decision to deny the adjournment or its reliance on the PLAR competency assessments.
