Board dismisses bias objection against panel member and rules comparative law expert evidence inadmissible.
During a hearing on a Charter challenge to section 12 of the Labour Relations Act, the respondents objected to a Board Member sitting on the panel due to comments he made in the Ontario Legislature 20 years prior.
The Board dismissed the bias objection, finding the comments did not create a reasonable apprehension of bias.
The Board also ruled that expert evidence concerning the scope of freedom of association in other countries was inadmissible during the section 2(d) phase of the hearing, though the proposed expert was found qualified to testify on comparative European labour law in the section 1 phase.
Canadian Guards Association v. Pinkerton's of Canada Ltd., 1990 CanLII 5732