The case involved a high-conflict family law trial following a 27-year marriage.
Key issues included spousal support entitlement and quantum, imputation of income to the applicant, division of vehicles, and the division of a federal pension at source.
The court found the applicant entitled to high-range spousal support, declined to impute additional income to her, and determined the "normal retirement date" for pension valuation purposes to be age 60 for Group 1 members of the Public Service Superannuation Act.
The court also addressed equalization payments, pre-judgment interest, and post-separation adjustments.
