The appellant appealed his convictions for pointing a firearm, robbery, and using a firearm while committing an indictable offence.
The convictions were largely based on a videotaped KGB statement given by a witness who claimed no memory of the events or the statement at trial.
The Court of Appeal upheld the trial judge's decision to admit the statement, finding it met the necessity and reliability requirements, and concluded the verdict was not unreasonable.
