2 total
Drainage appeal allowed; municipality ordered to pay 50% of engineering fees for deferred maintenance works.
The appellant appealed a municipal drainage report under section 48(1) of the Drainage Act, arguing that the benefits of the proposed works were not commensurate with the estimated costs.
The Tribunal found that while the proposed erosion and sediment control works would benefit the drainage area, the works were not currently required and were deferred to an undetermined future date.
Consequently, assessing properties now for the engineering fees of possible future improvements was not justified.
The Tribunal allowed the appeal and ordered the municipality to pay 50% of the engineering fees out of general funds.
Engineer's report set aside due to incorrect land use factors and improper pump system inclusion.
Several landowners appealed the 2022 Engineer's Report for the Cranberry Creek Municipal Drain, arguing that the land use factors (LUFs) were incorrect, the Pump and Dyke System was improperly included, and their properties were assessed too high.
The Tribunal found that the LUFs should have followed the Tribunal's 2020 Decision, which assigned lower factors to forested lands and provincially significant wetlands.
The Tribunal also found that the Pump and Dyke System had been abandoned and its inclusion constituted reconstruction, which falls outside the scope of a section 76 report.
Due to these and other significant errors in land use classification, the Tribunal set aside the 2022 Report.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.