The appellant lawyer was investigated by the Law Society for alleged involvement in mortgage fraud.
After a five-year delay, the Hearing Panel dismissed the disciplinary application, finding the delay caused the appellant serious psychological harm.
The Appeal Panel overturned this decision, finding the Hearing Panel misapprehended evidence regarding the appellant's cross-examination and applied the wrong legal test.
On appeal to the Divisional Court, the court restored the Hearing Panel's decision, holding that the Appeal Panel failed to show deference and that the unchallenged expert evidence clearly established the appellant suffered significant psychological harm due to the inordinate delay.