1 total
The Court of Appeal upheld an aggravated assault conviction, finding no errors in evidentiary rulings or jury instructions.
The appellant appealed his conviction for aggravated assault arising from injuries sustained by his cellmate at a correctional facility.
The appellant challenged the trial judge's admission of expert evidence regarding footwear impressions on the victim's face, the jury charge regarding inconsistencies in the appellant's statements, and the trial judge's response to a jury question on reasonable doubt.
The Court of Appeal upheld the conviction, finding no reversible error in the trial judge's evidentiary rulings or jury instructions.
