2 total
The Crown failed to prove a marijuana plant count exceeding 500 due to inadequate statistical sampling by police.
A Gardiner hearing was held to determine the number of marijuana plants for sentencing purposes after convictions for production and possession for trafficking.
The Crown sought to engage a mandatory minimum sentence based on a plant count exceeding 500.
The defence presented expert statistical evidence challenging the adequacy of the police's sampling methodology.
The court found that the Crown failed to prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the number of marijuana plants exceeded 500 due to the arbitrary sampling process, thus precluding reliance on the mandatory minimum.
However, the court accepted that it was a substantial marijuana grow operation for general sentencing purposes.
Supreme Court resolved the appeal under the governing legal framework.
Appeal decision of the Supreme Court of Canada in 2013 SCC 61, addressing the legal issues identified in the reasons and determining the matter on the basis set out by the Court.