In a contested divorce trial, the court determined parenting arrangements, equalization of net family property, and spousal and child support.
The parties shared joint custody of their child on a week-about schedule but disputed travel protocols, passport control, income for support purposes, and the valuation of several assets.
The respondent claimed large family loans evidenced by promissory notes to reduce his net family property; the court rejected the claim, finding the evidence unreliable and concluding the alleged debts were not proven.
The court determined the respondent’s income for support purposes exceeded his declared income and ordered ongoing spousal support and set-off child support.
The respondent was also ordered to pay a substantial equalization payment and maintain life insurance securing his support obligations.
