2 total
Bankruptcy appeal dismissed for lack of viable appellate route and merit.
The appellant challenged orders in bankruptcy proceedings including standing rulings, estate consolidation, and treatment of approved claims.
The court found no right of appeal under s. 193(a) or (c) of the BIA, declined leave under s. 193(e), and held the appellant had not timely invoked available statutory claim-challenge mechanisms.
The appeal was dismissed.
Exclusive possession granted; income imputed and interim support ordered amid inadequate disclosure.
On an interim family law motion, the applicant sought exclusive possession of the matrimonial home, interim spousal support, and an advance for expert valuation expenses relating to equalization.
The parties continued living in the matrimonial home in intolerable circumstances after separation, while the respondent possessed significantly greater financial resources and alternative accommodation.
The court granted the applicant exclusive possession, finding it reasonable that the respondent vacate given the applicant’s limited means and the presence of extended family members in the home.
Due to incomplete financial disclosure and evidence of substantial assets, the court imputed income of $100,000 to the respondent and ordered interim spousal support of $2,000 per month.
The court also ordered the respondent to advance $60,500 on equalization to permit the applicant to retain experts and ensure trial fairness.
