The applicant father brought a Motion to Change a 2017 final order that left his parenting time entirely at the respondent mother's discretion.
The mother conceded a material change in circumstances but sought to maintain highly restrictive, supervised-style access.
The court found the mother lacked insight, unjustifiably restricted the father's access, and failed to foster the child's relationship with him.
Relying on the Office of the Children's Lawyer report and the father's consistent commitment, the court significantly expanded the father's parenting time to include regular overnights and shared holidays, finding it in the child's best interests.
