2 total
Tribunal alters wind project approval, imposing stricter bat mitigation and removing turbines to protect turtles.
The appellants appealed the Director's decision to issue a Renewable Energy Approval for a wind facility, arguing it would cause serious and irreversible harm to the Little Brown Bat and Blanding's turtle.
In the remedy phase, the Approval Holder proposed mitigation plans to address the Tribunal's previous findings of harm.
The Tribunal found it had jurisdiction to consider the mitigation plans and applied the precautionary principle.
The Tribunal accepted the bat mitigation plan with a modification to extend turbine curtailment to sunrise.
However, the Tribunal found the proposed road restoration measures for Blanding's turtle were novel and unstudied, and therefore removed the turbines associated with those road upgrades from the approval.
Motion to narrow scope of remedy hearing and strike expert witness statements dismissed as premature.
Ostrander brought a motion to narrow the scope of the issues and evidence in a remedy hearing concerning a renewable energy approval for a wind turbine project, and to strike portions of the witness statements of two experts called by the Prince Edward County Field Naturalists.
The Tribunal dismissed the motion, finding it premature to narrow the scope of the remedy hearing given its broad remedial jurisdiction and the introduction of fresh evidence.
The Tribunal also declined to strike the expert witness statements, finding the proposed evidence relevant to the remedy and responsive to the fresh evidence.
No co-appearing lawyers found.
No judges found.