This is an appeal from a Superior Court order that upheld a Consent and Capacity Board decision.
The Board found the appellant incapable of consenting to treatment for antipsychotic medications and maintained her involuntary status.
The appellant argued a denial of procedural fairness, specifically that the Board failed to appoint amicus curiae.
The Court of Appeal dismissed the appeal, finding no reviewable error in the Board's determination of capacity or its decision to proceed without amicus, noting the appellant had access to counsel and chose to self-represent.
