2 total
The offender was sentenced to 3.5 years in custody for possessing child pornography, with the court rejecting that his brain injury reduced moral culpability.
Stephen John LeClair pleaded guilty to two counts of possessing child pornography and one count of accessing child pornography.
The Crown sought a 4-year prison sentence, while the defence argued for a conditional sentence of 2 years less a day or a 12-month jail sentence.
The court considered the large volume and vile nature of the child pornography, the severe victim impact, and the primary sentencing principles of denunciation and deterrence.
While acknowledging the offender's remorse, low risk of reoffending, and prior good character, the court found that an alleged acquired brain injury did not reduce moral culpability.
The court concluded that a conditional sentence was inappropriate given the gravity of the offences and the need for a strong denunciatory and deterrent message.
A sentence of 3.5 years in custody was imposed.
Application for psychological assessment dismissed as injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline and limit was exhausted.
The applicant sought a medical and rehabilitation benefit for a psychological assessment following a motor vehicle accident.
The respondent denied the benefit, asserting the applicant's injuries fell within the Minor Injury Guideline (MIG) and the $3,500 limit was exhausted.
The Tribunal found that the applicant's physical injuries were sprains and strains falling within the MIG.
The Tribunal rejected the applicant's claims of psychological impairment and chronic pain, finding insufficient medical evidence to support either diagnosis.
As the applicant's injuries were predominantly minor and the MIG limit was exhausted, the application was dismissed.